For those
citizens of Humphreys County who are excited about Chief Wayne Ellison running
for Sheriff we would like to share some information that clearly displays the
nervousness of some who do not want to see him (Ellison) run. Over the past week,
we have heard rumors that some of the New Johnsonville City Council members have
taking issue with the Chiefs running and they are trying to use a section of
the City Charter to express some concerns that Chief Ellison is not eligible to
run or must resign as Chief in order to run.
After hearing
about this, we at the HCIndependent set out to get to the bottom of what
appears to us as a political move by some to prevent the Chief from becoming
our next Sheriff. Moreover, we have found that the City Charter, specifically
the section they are trying to use to prevent city employees from running for
office while remaining employees, may very well be in violation of state law.
Below is the section of the Charter we
will be discussing.
SECTION
3.11. POLITICAL ACTIVITY PROHIBITED. BE ITFURTHER ENACTED, That no employee of
the city shall continue in the employment of the city after becoming a candidate
for nomination or election to any public office, but this provision shall not
apply to the mayor, councilmen, C-17 members of boards or commissions, the city
attorney, or other officers of the city. No person shall directly or indirectly
give, render or pay any money, service or other valuable consideration to any
person for or on account of or in connectionwith employment by the city
government. No person shall orally, by letter or otherwise solicit or be in any
manner concerned in soliciting any assessment, subscription or contribution
from any employee of the city in connection with any city election. An officer
or employee of the city, other than the mayor or a member of council, shall not
make any contribution to the campaign funds of any candidate in any city
election. Any person who by himself or with others willfully or corruptly
violates any provision of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and
upon conviction thereof he shall immediately forfeit and vacate the office or
position he holds and be ineligible to hold any office or position of employment
in the city government for a period of five years thereafter.
After reading this
section one might say, “Well the Chief cannot run and remain the Chief of
Police”, however, the question we ask is, “Can or does a City Charter have the
power to supersede state law or operate in conflict with opinions set forth by
the Tennessee Attorney General’s Office?” We have found that the answer is no!
In fact, T.C.A. 7-51-1501 actually supersedes any provision in a
City Charter that would bar a city employee from running for state or local
office while remaining an employee.
In addition, does that
law protect employees from being fired or asked to resign? To that, we say yes!
The only stipulation in T.C.A. 7-51-1501 that would prevent the Chief from
remaining employed is that he (Ellison) cannot run for city office, however
running for state or other local office is a right guaranteed to him
and protected
by Tennessee state law.
T.C.A.
7-51-1501 reads as follows,
Rights guaranteed to local
government employees. Notwithstanding
the provisions of any county, municipal, metropolitan, or other local governmental
charter to the contrary, and notwithstanding the provisions of any resolution
or ordinance adopted by any such county, municipality or other local
governmental unit to the contrary, every employee of every such local
governmental unit shall enjoy the same rights of other citizens of Tennessee to
be a candidate for any state or local political office, the right to
participate in political activities by supporting or opposing political
parties, political candidates, and petitions to governmental entities;
provided, further, the city, county, municipal, metropolitan or other local
government is not required to pay the employee's salary for work not performed
for the governmental entity; and provided, further, that unless otherwise
authorized by law or local ordinance, an employee of a municipal government or
of a metropolitan government shall not be qualified to run for elected office
in the local governing body of such local governmental unit in which the
employee is employed.
Now we
already know what some of you will say and that is, “The language of the law
states notwithstanding the provisions of the charter and this
simply word makes it legal for a city to bar its employees from running for any
political office or allows for the termination or request for resignation of
that employee”. Therefore, we at the HCIndependent looked even deeper into the
complex labyrinth of our states laws and we found several articles and Attorney
General Opinions that clearly state that employees for a governmental
subdivision may run for local or state office, just not for office in the governmental
subdivision they work.
The use
of the word notwithstanding is meant to convey that while state law
clearly allows a governmental subdivision to restrict an employee from running
for political office in the subdivision of government they work, they can amend
their charter to allow that employee to run for office within that subdivision,
if they so choose. It is not a blanket statement set
forth to allow a governmental subdivision, is this case the City of New
Johnsonville, to completely bar or terminate an employee who wishes to run for
other offices within a different governmental subdivision, in this case County
Sheriff.
In an opinion
that was wrote by Tennessee Attorney General Robert Cooper in August 2010, (Opinion
No. 10-94) the General opined that T.C.A. 7-51-1501 effectively overrules
every local governmental charter provision or ordinance that purports to limit
the listed political activities of its employees. Including the
right to run for or be a candidate for any state or local elective office. The
General further opined that pursuant to this statute, local employees are not
prohibited
by any city or county charter provision from running for elective office.
However, unless authorized by law or local ordinance, an employee of a governmental
body is not qualified to run for elected office in the local governing body in
which the employee is employed.
Link to Tennessee Attorney General Opinion 10-94
Link to Tennessee Attorney General Opinion 10-94
This is where the simply meaning of
the word notwithstanding comes into play again and the use of it
to convey while a governmental subdivision may and can bar its employees from
running for office within that subdivision, it may also amend its charter to allow
its employees to run for elected office within that subdivision, if they so
choose. (See also Opinion 96-106)
A governmental
subdivision cannot design within the framework of its charter any policy,
provision, section or ordinance that would seek to or does degrade or limited
any state law unless that state law itself has design within its own framework
to allow those policy, provision, sections or ordinances as with the notwithstanding
provision of T.C.A. 7-51-1501.
Now, the fact that the City
of New Johnsonville’s Charter states that employees may not run for any
public office and remain an employee is in clear violation of a state
law that guarantees that employee the rights and freedoms enjoyed
by any other citizen of the state who wishes to seek public office. Moreover,
the fact that T.C.A. 7-51-1501 supersedes any provision of
any charter that would attempt to deny an employee their right to seek a
political office outside their governmental subdivision of employment, in our
opinion, nullifies most of Section 3.11 of the New Johnsonville
City Charter.
Based on this nullification
by a superseding
state law, It is our opinion any attempt to terminate an employee
or ask them to resign for running for public office outside their governmental
subdivision of employment, while using a public policy, in this case the City Charter,
is in violation of state law and may be considered wrongful termination.
This could open the city to liability and damages under civil court
proceedings.
We have heard from some
citizens of New Johnsonville that Chief Ellison has support among some of the
Council members. However, we understand that several of the New Johnsonville
City Counsel members are friends of our current
Sheriff or they work for him at the Sheriff’s Department (Councilmen/Sheriff’s
Office Capt. Rob Edwards) and it is not hard to figure out why some of them may
be pushing the subject.
Now we are not
saying that Sheriff Davis is behind this move however, we have heard that the
idea of running against the Chief makes him (Davis) and others very nervous and
rightfully so. With a record like his
(Davis) going up against the record the Chief has, we surmises there are some
sleepless nights going on at the Davis residence.
In addition, if there has
been some kind of political move on the part of those who would like to see Sheriff
Davis remain in office so he (Davis) may continue his reign of “alleged” corruption
and moral deviancy, or because you are afraid
you will be out when he (Davis) is, we say nice try and better luck next time.
Just remember that change is coming and we are watching this election very
close and all the old political tactics and tricks used in the past will be
meet head on using the law and common sense.
We encourage the
residences of New Johnsonville who support the Chief becoming our next Sheriff
to contact their City Counsel Person and/or Mayor and ask them to seek clarification
of the law and if clarification confirms to them the City Charter is in
violation of state law, to correct the issue as soon as possible.
To Chief Ellison we
have a simple message. Keep your chin up, your head level, put your knees in
the breeze, drive-on to the Ranger objective, sir, and always remember Rangers
lead the way! This county needs you and from the amount of messages we have received
about you running for Sheriff, they want you as well. We will be following this issue extremely close!!!!!!!!!
In the "city charter" it states: this provision shall not apply to the mayor, councilmen, C-17 members of boards or commissions, the city attorney, or other officers of the city. Wouldn't the Chief of Police of the city of New Johnsonville be considered an "officer of the city"? That would mean that the provision does NOT apply to him and he would be legally elligible to run without any repercussions.
ReplyDeleteAlso in using this same provision, those already holding office would have to make sure and follow ALL of the provision including: An officer or employee of the city, other than the mayor or a member of council, shall not make any contribution to the campaign funds of any candidate in any city election. Any person who by himself or with others willfully or corruptly violates any provision of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof he shall immediately forfeit and vacate the office or position he holds and be ineligible to hold any office or position of employment in the city government for a period of five years thereafter.
So campaigning would have to be done outside their offices and without there city office supplies and city office employees. They would not be able to take campaign donations from other city employees or officials. This would put a dent in quite a few...
ReplyDeleteYou would think being the Chief of Police would be considered an”officer of the city”, however it is not. The Chief can run for a County office, he just can’t run for any elected position in New Johnsonville. However, Mr. Tim Daniel is in violation of the City of Waverly Municipal Codes by holding elected offices and being an employee of Waverly. Our opinion is that he and Councilman/defacto Chief Deputy for Sheriff Davis/ Rob Edwards are behind what was a failed attempt to place political hardship on the Chief. This is because they fear him and the fact he has a large amount of support and can and will beat Davis in the election for Sheriff.