Sunday, April 14, 2013

I will be objective,but I think he is innocent! ;)


As you look at this photograph, we would like you to ask yourself, “Does “the Colonel” Mr. Williams have a conflict of interest in conducting an ethics investigation requested by a citizen of Humphreys County?” This photograph proves that he is a public supporter of Sheriff Davis. Is that not a conflict of interest? If you have read the letters from Mr. Hamm, you will see that he requested Mr. Williams remove himself from that investigation due to several conflicts of interest and ask for the TBI or State Attorney General to conduct it. However, in a response letter from the “the Colonel” he refused to do so, stating that he did not feel there was a conflict. Well imagine that! Mr. Hamm even asked the County Commission request Mr. Williams step aside and put this matter on the agenda to be discussed. However, no such discussion has been placed on any agenda, nor any request made to “the Colonel” and it appears, in our opinion, they are ignoring him in hope he will just go away! Now you tell us that protectionism is not “allegedly” going on in Humphreys County and it is perpetrated from the very top! We have an idea Colonel, just ask the Sheriff to conduct the investigation. After all the outcome would be the same as if you did it! This is further proof a change needs to happen in Humphreys County and those in elected positions to govern this county are dictated what to do by those who "allegedly" are more interesting in protecting each other than the public trust!

1 comment:

  1. Federal Grand jury testimony may be relevant to all investigations.

    ReplyDelete

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.